|
|
|
|||||||
| Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida & Minnesota U.S.
Posts: 252
|
Of course when I discuss it with people, I do tend to say, based on the "American" way of looking at wolf blood, that Luna is really no more than about 3% "wolf"... for me, I sort of think of "wolf blood" as "pure wolf blood" - once there is a mix, even though it has a percentage of wolf blood, it is still a mix, so I think of "wolf blood" as the amount of "pure wolf" in her.
It also reinforces to the public that she is NOT a wolf-hybrid, she is a dog and 3% sounds "friendlier" to them and 30%. Most of the time I tend to describe the vlcak as a breed that "looks like a wolf, acts like a shepherd." People are more likely to interact with her when they think she has little to no wolf in her - initially they suspect she is a hybrid and stay away, but when I describe her as a DOG that just happens to look wolfy they want to pet her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Entità cinofila da web...
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,110
|
Quote:
I guess that at this point of development of the breed, and after so many generations from the last pure wolf, they should be considered DOGS. They may be a “difficult” and peculiar breed, yes, but they are still dogs. And if we actually portrayed them as such, there would be many less fanatical people getting them because they want a “wolf”. I think that it would have been better for the sake of the breed if it’s name was “Czechoslovakian Shepherd” instead of “Czechoslovakian Wolfdog”, but this is of course just a personal opinion Last edited by Fede86; 09-06-2010 at 11:01. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
Lunas Mom, take a look at Belyaev (foxes) and Tryon (rats) works about effects of selection, it would help to relativise this %.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.amicale-chien-loup-tcheco...m/csvstat.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Entità cinofila da web...
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,110
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
Quote:
Well, personally I don't really care how wofish my dog is or what her genotype is..., but... WHY, in your opinion, do CSV play wolves in films? I bet it'd be much easier to train a GSD than a CSV to act wolf....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
Fede, indeed you are talking about "Wolves genes" (not Wolfblood -which is just a math number-).
You know wolves and dogs are very very close regarding DNA sharing, and sometimes only a very little change in the genome may lead to huge structural/functionnal changes, so it's not expectable to be mesured lineary (like a %). Those kind of researches are rather new and are possible with use of DNA chip + computer analisis, you can make a google search with these words to go deeper: "Genome wide SNP haplotype dog domestication". To complicate more, genes tend not to work alone but into what we call a 'genetic regulatory network' (GNR), this is also highly non linear processes. And in addition, you have other levels of regulation at "expression time" (ARN modulation by proteines is an exemple) => same genes -> different expressions. So, as you guess, no straight conclusion like this possible.
__________________
http://www.amicale-chien-loup-tcheco...m/csvstat.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Entità cinofila da web...
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,110
|
Quote:
Last edited by Fede86; 09-06-2010 at 16:40. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
We've discovered this long time ago
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Florida & Minnesota U.S.
Posts: 252
|
Statistically, I was looking at the number of GSDs and wolves that were used as foundation stock for our breed. 48 GSDs and 5 wolves. 5 is not 30% of 48.
Also, per one of the above posts, as the "best of the best" of the CSVs were selected to be bred, likely it was an overwhelming amount of GSD genetics that were selected for. Yes, they look very wolfy (though a lot of GSDs do too) phenotypically, most "wolf" behavioral characteristics were selected AGAINST - such as flight response, shyness, nervousness, independence, etc. Most of the desireable behavioral characteristics that were selected FOR were GSD traits - courage, biddability, social/pack drive, etc. The wolf and dog genome are almost identical as dogs, obviously ARE wolves - albeit domesticated. Our advantage is that we know what wolf blood we used, and there may be some DNA characteristics (mitochondrial or other) specific to our Carpathian wolves. Certainy there are differences morphologically. So perhaps in the future we can recognize those markers and determine EXACTLY how much "wolf" is in any given CSV. Until then I will just enjoy my DOG. Oh, just because CSVs are often used to portray wolves, doesn't necessarily mean they look exactly like wolves... here in the U.S. I know of many film shots of "wolves" are played by sable GSDs, Malamutes and sometimes even Belgian shepherds! I am hoping that having a CSV available for film work will help change that, as my own dogs have been in multiple film projects - in other roles of course - they've played Police K9s or guard dogs and even "crippled" dogs in need of a doggie stroller... |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|