Quote:
Originally Posted by Helenasotis
Anonymní admine beze jména, četl/a jsi můj příspěvek ze dneška v 15:53????
Asi ne - tedy ještě jednou a doporučuji se podívat na odkazovanou stránku!
" Pokud chcete argumentovat tím, že pes pak bude na náhledu "příliš malý", tak si dovolím podotknout, že za prvé má každý možnost se podívat na fotku ve velkém v galerii daného psa, za druhé já na svých stránkách také používám náhledy u infa o vrhu o velikosti 300 ob delší strany (přesně tedy 300x200) a je to zcela dostačující a alespoň mají fotky jednotný vzhled a stránka vypadá mnohem upraveněji - http://www.sotis.eu/Odchovy/vrh-c-sotis." |
I hope I get you right.
No - it is wrong example as it is already something what we use for the database for a long time. In this case you should use this photo as example:
(I don't think that anybody can see anything here - not even if it is male or female)
Do you think it is a good photo for the database for this dog? Because 99% of the photos are exactly like this - huge photo with a small wolfdog. Good for the gallery but useless for the database.
The database on Wolfdog is nothing uncommon. Please take a look on the breed databases present on internet and check the photos which are used there. Best and most know example is the GSD database:
http://www.schaeferhunden.eu/winsis_...=&id=3371&tp=5
I really see no sence to make Wolfdog database MUCH WORSER as it is now. Because using the photos "as they are" for the main photo in the database will cause that it will be useless and without any sense.
But I respect your right. As I respect the copyrights. Everybody who don't want to have the photos changed please contact me - I will make a list and I will remove all photos which were cut. We will add only your photos to the database which don't need to be edited but at the same time which fulfill the old requirements. All other will be removed. I think it is fair deal.
16-08-2010, 21:33
Threaded Mode