DM transmission: DM/DM x DM/DM = N/DM?

[wolfin]

Originally Posted by Rona

Many CSVs have been DM tested by Daniela at Prague University. All results of vlcaks from Poland (+ Lithuania?, Slovakia?, etc.) tested in Prague fit precisely into the pattern (n/n, n/dm, dm/dm) which indicates high validity of the testing procedures.

I wonder what's the statistical probability that a couple of dogs from the same kennel underwent the mutation?

Poland dog are tested in Laboklin too, Lithuanian in OFFA too.

[Rona]

Originally Posted by wolfin

Poland dog are tested in Laboklin too, Lithuanian in OFFA too.

Sure, some were, but:

Many CSVs have been DM tested by Daniela at Prague University.

I meant, wherever the dogs were tested - in Laboklin, OFA or in Prague, by saliva or blood samples, the results fit each other and the whole pattern. What's more - they confirn the earlier tests That's why saying that one lab's more reliable than another makes no sense.
The case considered here could be a mutation, a mistake, a miracle or a lie and the question is - which are more probable, and which less.