![]() |
![]() |
|
Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
In army was very strict selection, as Ina wrote here. Only a few best hybrids with best working character was used for next breeding. Other dogs............
![]() It can be problem for people, which will want now create new bloodline. In past was used from 1 litter maybe 2 pups. But now if we will have litter of hybrids, every owner will want use his own hybrid for next breeding. Bad dogs too. It is nothing good for breed. For breed is bad situation now, when are in breeding used almost all wolfdogs with 4 legs. Nobody select for character. It is very bad especially for our breed with wolf´s blood. cs. wolfdog was created as working breed. And now- look at population..... So I think some new experiments without selection is nonsens. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
![]()
I fully agree with Hanka, though neither am I involved in breeding, nor intend to be.
Having read about training methods and selection procedures in PS Kennel I cannot imagine it feasible to reconstruct "military approach" at present and in civilian conditions. Who today: 1. would provide funding of a few hrs daily standardized training for pups and dogs in one place for several years? (including fees for scientists, costs of health testing, wages for trainers and for dog handlers/leaders from the same area willing to work with dogs most of their time?) 2. would take decisions to eutanize pups/hybrids that would not pass exteremely tough working/tracking tests and... carry out these decisions ![]() ![]() ![]() 3. would agree to have his/her beautiful and loveable dog (hybrid?) eutanized (or even just sterelized), only because he/she would not have passed the working/tracking/trailing tests? etc. etc. 4. If having a very detailed breed standard available, the csv community among themselves cannot agree about simple bonitation standards ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 5. And last but not least: adding fresh wolf blood into the CSV breed would mean that in some countries csv would be authomatically banned and in some others would have less chance to be legalized. ![]() Last edited by Rona; 12-11-2010 at 13:40. Reason: spel. er. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bad Dürkheim
Posts: 2,249
|
![]()
I fully agree with both Hanka and of course Rona.
In comparison, much more dogs were killed rather than used for breeding and establishing the "new breed". Which nowadays ought to make it impossible for ethical reasons, bringing in"new wolf blood". Living with European wolves and knowing quite a few F1-crosses, I honestly can say you don't really want these animals as pets once they're adult... Unfortunately there are a few psychos around who want exactly this. But that's another story... Quote:
And it continues! And I don't speak of the "Mutaras" or only one mix or litter. They have normal FCI pedigrees though false parents or at least fathers named. Have a look in the database or litters. Cheers, Michael |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
![]() Quote:
I sometimes feel it's a pity there is no selection for good, ethical breeders ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() What I meant was an official, but badly prepared, carelessly organized and irresponsibly carried out "wolfblood insertion" into the breed. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Just a few points -
At least to my knowledge, 'culling' of breeding stock today doesn't always have to equate to the older use of euthanasia. Rather, the dog is simply neutered/spayed and 'removed' that way from genetic contributions. 'Regular' breeders today use sterilization as a form of culling. This thread was not meant to say that there should be new wolf blood, and given the replies here, I totally agree that it would make recognition or further acceptance difficult if not impossible. And that there wouldn't be an ethical way to go about this nowadays, not that I agree it was ethical 'back then', either. But if necessary, the inclusion of new blood doesn't have to come through neither wolf nor German Shepherd Dog. There have been back-cross projects in Dalmatians and Boxers alike that utilized breeds not originally linked to their foundation, including Pointers (for the Dalmatian project to 'solve' the uric acid problem) and Corgis (in the Boxer backcross natural bob-tail project by geneticist Dr Bruce Cattanach). Dr. Cattanach's Boxers are now KC/FCI registrable and within about 5 generations you (and KC judges of breed) could not tell either temperamentally nor physically that his Boxers were 'mixed', so to speak. Genetics is awfully fascinating, isn't it? But now I am off-topic. Thank you for all the replies on the original wolves! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
The breed czechoslovakian wolfdog is a breed between carpathian wolf and german shepard. Why everybody is talking to cross again with a wolf and why nobody thinks to cross with a german shepard? A nice eastern grey line. None aggressiv, nice to people with best working abilitys? In second generation again breed with a csw, nobody will see it.
By selectiv breeding and using a "good" open friendly wolf with a real good and friendly csw female with best working abilities the most pups could be used. But by the way, who of the breeders is breeding after working abilities today? I do not know one. There is a hand full who seems to have "working" dogs. But 5 from 100 or better 500. So it is academical this question, if a F 1 is able to work. If you will breed the F 1 with a good working dog, you will get a workable F 2. I know some good working F 1 and F 2. There is no problem, but of course you have to select the wolf! And it is right you can not take a wolf and say go and mate the dog. Wolves are like we are, they first have to "marry" and they stay all their lifes together. So the easiest way is to raise up a wolf cub with a csw pup. And than you wait 3 years. Even the german shepard was founded like this, crossing in 4 wolves. I got the old pedigrees showing it. And in the old version from the book The german shepard from 1921, 6. edition, the breed founder Max von Stephanitz is writing about this. No pup must put to death because he maybe would not like to work. There are so many proves in interent with videos that people do live with F 1, F 2 high content in their houses without any problems. Most of the csw make more problems than any F 1 high content. Because the german shepard makes them hyperactiv and is the problem! If you know how to live with wolves and F 1 there is no problem. But you should never hit your animals, like some "specialist" do. One is writing here. So no wonder that he has bad experience. It is very simple "make the difference". And of course there are shy and timid wolves, but friendly and open ones too. And of course, Rona, the reality is that the people want real wolfdogs and they do not care for wrong papers! And of course they know what they got! Christian www.wolfdogs-siouxtala.de You can read on my website about the different kind of wolves under the page wolves! Wolves have a different character, like you and me, and every dog. And breeding with wolves of course you do not have to take wild ones, but in captivity raised ones, who have proven that they are able to work. Last edited by hanninadina; 12-11-2010 at 19:57. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
That is not the point. The csw is a breed which started with taking a wolf! And they did take a wolf who was not trained. They took one from zoo! And the first german shepard was not able to breed the first wolvin! So they took a real strong character and of coure he was very aggressiv! He did not care that Brita did not want to breed. Maybe that is the reason why most of the csw are kind of aggressiv - old genetics. In france is in the moment a big problem with aggressiv csw. There are a lot of them in shelters! The breeders did not expalin the people what kind of dogs they are.
You can absolutely not compare to train a wolf to train a tiger! The founder of the german shepard called a wolf a wild dog! When he is writing about wolves, he is always writing about wild dogs! These wolves you see in the pic are walked with visitors. Of course they are young in the moment. We will see how it develops. But here we are talking not that people should buy a wolf as a dog, but if it is impossible to bring in fresh blood, before this nature breed will go down because of illness. Yes, you are right, that was not the topic, but I did not start writing about this but answering to. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Canadian Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montréal
Posts: 423
|
![]()
Thank you for your post Hanka
![]() I don’t think it’s a necessary to introduce new wolf blood in the CsV... Just try to make the right choice when you planned a litter... Like Rona I don’t think follow the “Bonitation Standard” is a good long term solution. For example I know my girls have a too long tail... But... She is a good behaviour dog with a really healthy condition ![]() ![]() Is it true that some breeders cheat about their pups and introduces new wolf blood in there kennel... I can imagine why, but I don’t understand, I saw a lot of “!!!MIX!!!” in the database... So ok it’s a fact they have wolf like parents, but some are really unknown and report as true CsV? And those hybrids are for sell? I really don’t understand why. I can only imagine this Mix for their proper use in there kennel but not for sell... ![]() On the French part of the forum there is a thread about “American Wolfdog” and it’s really amazing because people doesn’t really understand that is not a real Breed of dogs like the Czechoslovakian Wolfdog or the Saarloos... So it’s really easy to cheat by pretending our hybrids are a foreigner breed or something like that... So why claim they are true CsV? Anyway, it’s really interesting ![]() Best regards, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
http://www.srdcervac.wbs.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Unhošť - Nouzov
Posts: 1,313
|
![]() Quote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/smecka31...tych_Rakousko# |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
http://www.srdcervac.wbs.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Unhošť - Nouzov
Posts: 1,313
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|