|
|
|
|||||||
| Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
Thanks for explanations Hanka (and don't worry for you english which is as mine).
I can add something in the stat tool with these rules, but I did not understood the separation between groups because you can have dogs who belong to more than one group.
__________________
http://www.amicale-chien-loup-tcheco...m/csvstat.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yes, I know. Sometimes can be male in more groups, but there is important for example Rep z PS, BUT OVER male XY......
Because almost all dogs have Rep |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
Yeah Rep z PS is every living CSV pedigrees, no exception. I was more thinking about Gar z Rosíkova.
Tell me if this is correct: - for group I and II, you only check for father line ? And for other group you check for all ancestors (father and mother lines) ? - for group II, when you write "in their pedigries are Cézar od Pavlišina and Káj z Rosíkova", to be in group II dogs should have both Cézar and Káj, or only one of them is enough ? I'm going to add those groups classification in the tool, same groups are also used by Slovak club or do they have their own ?
__________________
http://www.amicale-chien-loup-tcheco...m/csvstat.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
Elf, I send you names of dogs in groups, it is maybe better to see it. You can look at pedigries.
In groups we look at father lines. But we have groups of females too. By females is normal to look at families (not father lines). But just for interest we have females in groups (father lines ) too. But give me time. I send you email. If you will make some program for it, it can be good for all owners of males, if they will want watch groups. but maybe somewhere can be problem- for example if does not exist father line, in group can be some male which have blood of same "first reproductor" in mother line too. Unfortunatelly we lost some bloods in past..... it is not "clear", but it is "solution of emergency". It is a pitty, you don´t speak czech |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
Hi, added "CZ breeding groups" feature in the Stat tool, let me know if it's working properly. You can also use + feature between IDs to simulate a mating.
Exemples: Akim z Revíru vlku Akim z Revíru vlku + Arielle la Seven Loup Cie
__________________
http://www.amicale-chien-loup-tcheco...m/csvstat.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
wow this is just to good
Now I can play the hole weekend ![]() Very best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
I gave a short test for those groups criterions consistency, seems not very high, which means the expected "breeding effect" would not be as desired.
For exemple too many dogs in group X are also in group Y and/or Z etc. This is mainly probably because the dogs chosen to define groups are not discriminating enough, it would be maybe needed to redefine the groups criterions (for exemple by using more "recent dogs" ?). In this thread http://www.wolfdog.org/forum/showthread.php?t=9817 we can see more contemporary dogs heavily present in current living dogs pedigrees, just picked some of them: 3.23256510027% -- 1991.11.13 -- Dora Šedá eminence (4212) 2.61552275919% -- 1993.01.05 -- Amur z Dáblova kanonu CS (340 2.19878893929% -- 1992.03.10 -- Besi Zeper CS (2865) 2.19802147369% -- 1990.02.16 -- Alma z Kladenské záre CS (2864) 2.18036976493% -- 1991.01.29 -- Ajax Brevnovská stopa CS (2841) 2.13048450103% -- 1992.05.30 -- Aras z Jundrovského boru CS (2776) 2.10976292988% -- 1992.02.02 -- Omar z Krotkovského dvora CS (2749) 2.10669306748% -- 1994.09.26 -- Charon Šedá eminence (2745) 2.0990184115% -- 1991.01.29 -- Atos Brevnovská stopa CS (2735) 1.77668286019% -- 1993.03.04 -- Colt Zeper CS (2315) 1.73600718348% -- 1991.10.05 -- Farna Jimili CS (2262) 4.26505400943% -- 1996.10.24 -- Dalos Duna Fehérlófia (2144) 3.37185939645% -- 1996.10.17 -- Dik Brevnovská stopa CS (1695) 2.50054705683% -- 1996.10.24 -- Dinon Dánon Fehérlófia (1257) 2.32946746504% -- 1995.01.17 -- Adon Irpruš (1171) 2.10467683861% -- 1996.09.29 -- Juna Hlas divociny CS (105 1.91768286618% -- 1996.10.17 -- Dita Brevnovská stopa CS (964) 1.85004674849% -- 1996.11.10 -- Milo Ruskov dvor CS (930) 1.83612166544% -- 1995.10.27 -- Ali Reolup (923) 1.81225009449% -- 1998.10.27 -- Clover ---(priv. Rienzi)--- (911) 1.79832501144% -- 1996.10.22 -- Cira Volání rodu (904) 5.84204098249% -- 2000.03.15 -- Oasia ---Passo del Lupo--- (861) 5.40778938798% -- 2001.04.12 -- Cutt ---dell'Irco Sortiere--- (797) 2.68693174108% -- 2002.10.03 -- Miky Passo del Lupo (396) 1.58094721129% -- 2000.05.15 -- Jolly z Molu Es (233) 1.39774731985% -- 2000.01.02 -- Legra ---Passo del Lupo--- (206) 1.32989550821% -- 2000.01.25 -- Fallko Kollárov dvor (196) Said in other words, nowadays it's maybe more relevant for a dog to be said for exemple X% of Dalos Duna Fehérlófia and Y% of Cutt ---dell'Irco Sortiere--- etc, than to be X% of Gar z Rosíkova and Y% of Káj z Rosíkova.
__________________
http://www.amicale-chien-loup-tcheco...m/csvstat.html Last edited by elf; 03-06-2010 at 17:15. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|