|
_Administration Questions connected with Wolfdog.org, database and other technical matters.... |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26-01-2010, 19:23 | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mestre
Posts: 2,300
|
Marta please let Mijke out from the list for the moment because it's not clear what he thinks about this last proposal.
|
26-01-2010, 19:28 | #22 | |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
|
Quote:
We now are in 77 |
|
26-01-2010, 19:48 | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: D 72213-Altensteig-Wart
Posts: 365
|
I think it's important to publish all results and announce dogs in the list, which have a breeding license in their country.
It's my decision and my responsibility to take a male with bad results to my female. (surely it shouldn't be) If all results are published without evaluating, mybe people will send more results to the database. Like Ina and other breeders, I want to know as much as possible about the dogs and the next of kin. Greetings Bille |
26-01-2010, 20:03 | #24 |
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
Sorry Martab my falt I meant post nr 3 and 8 not nr 2 and 8
I´m Mikael not Mijke by the way Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
|
26-01-2010, 22:00 | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,061
|
Yes you are totally correct
But you can call me Judith whereas Jmvdwiel is "against of removing the dogs without ED results", but I guess not against including dogs WITH ED results, whatever the result is. Is it correct? |
26-01-2010, 23:32 | #26 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
|
thank you Judith and Mikael
|
27-01-2010, 00:15 | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warnsveld
Posts: 2,033
|
Sorry for al misunderstanding by my fault!!
In post nr 8 I did mention with 75 - 1 : 75 for publishing - against 1 admin So I am correct on the list!
__________________
Vriendelijke groeten, Mijke PS: I am not a moderator anymore!! |
27-01-2010, 01:42 | #28 |
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
Thanks Mijke for clearing that all out...
Than it is 79-1 or 79-0 as Admin has not really voted yet And I hope he will vote 80-0 Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
|
27-01-2010, 11:00 | #29 | |
Member
|
Quote:
Please publish all dogs. |
|
27-01-2010, 11:16 | #30 | |
Junior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
27-01-2010, 12:08 | #31 | |
Senior Member
|
I would like to point out that the initial message of the list does NOT say that ALL dogs with ED0 or 1 SHOULD be on the list...not at all.
Quote:
My position is the following, and I've expressed it many times. Studlist: all dogs can be studs "advertise" studs then put limits and apply them. It is authorised to use HDC in some countries, and in others not. ED1 is also of common use. But if WD wants to exclude these dogs, then be it, take ALL dogs with ED1 , HDC or WITHOUT results (official results, proven with copy sent to ADMIN or Margo in the past) OFF the list. I made HD to Oliver when he was 14 months old...and forgot to make ED...which I made when he was 3 years old. My choice...but Oliver deserves to be in the list in this case. Massimo
__________________
---------- Oliver & Lunatica |
|
27-01-2010, 18:58 | #32 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Verona
Posts: 4,419
|
A possible proposal we discussed in the Italian forum is: publishing all studs, and flagging with a particular symbol the studs that are in possession of all the requirements indicated by the Clubs.
A disclaimer at the beginning of the list together with a legend could explain: - that dogs are included in the list together with HD and ED results (if available), - that it is highly recommendable to check carefully HD and EH results; - that according to "X" Kennel club only studs with (for instance) HD A to B, ED 0 should be used for breeding, and according to "Y" Kennel club..(to be completed with other requirements if different) - that the symbol "#" means that the dog is in possession of all the requirements requested by "X" Kennel Club, that the symbol "¶" mens that he dog is in possession of all the requirements requested by "Y" Kennel Club... The symbols I indicated are only an example; we could make different colors, or adding a column ...or whatever could be useful to identify "recommended" studs, without eliminating the others, and leaving breeders free to choose and/or evaluate. I believe this way of proceeding could be a fair compromise between who wants rigid rules to be applied in order to safeguard the breed, and who prefers to be provided with as much information as possible about all existing studs |
27-01-2010, 20:27 | #33 |
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
I just want to ask when we are in the change the roles section, even if it might be a bit off topic...
Can a breeder put up for example a litter on this site even if the dogs is for example HD C/C X E/E or A/A X D/D ??? Is the only role now official HD result, no matter the result ??? Best regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
|
04-02-2010, 13:49 | #34 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
|
is possible to have an answer from Admin please?
|
04-02-2010, 13:56 | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mestre
Posts: 2,300
|
Admin Please!!! Lesten to us!
Pleeeeeeeease |
05-02-2010, 15:45 | #36 | |
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Saschia (Sasa Zahradnikova) http://www.chiens-loup-tchecoslovaqu...ei-et-damon.ws |
|
05-02-2010, 23:10 | #37 |
Member
|
Exactly...
I plan on breeding in America. I have 2 males & 2 females. All from decent lines, and none with HD or ED results
(Piter has his as a "B", but I want to re-certify once I change to AKC/FSS Pedigree) results. I have a female (Estia) who was hit by a car at a young age. Her fractured hip is bad on x-ray. Her other hip is probably a "B" according to OFA. I don't like Italy's methods. I want to return to America with a reputation, preferably good in the sense that I haven't bred any bad dogs. NOR do I have the intention to. I want to do everything in my power to represent my country and my kennels as an asset to the breed. Does anyone know the method of HD testing Mexico has. If I move there can I be listed as a breeder? Just curious.... |
08-02-2010, 13:56 | #38 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
|
admin has not responded to anyone.
But it seems to he has responded with updates on new lists of stud-dog. 2 examples http://www.wolfdog.org/php/modules.p...ogs&country=IT http://www.wolfdog.org/php/modules.p...ogs&country=CZ Last edited by Ricky's Wolf; 08-02-2010 at 13:59. |
06-03-2010, 14:25 | #39 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 583
|
Quote:
After hot discussion with some moderators I agreed with their arguments. So we decided to include all dogs also the ill dogs (if they have the stud dog rights). So it will be as it always was - on the stud dog list will be listed all dogs which have breeding rights in their countries. The only additional requirement will be: they must have official HD results HD-A, HD-B or HD-C. The breeder will decide to possible use dogs with ellbow dysplasia, heart problems, epilepsy or other problems. STILL excluded will be all mixes and not pure breed CzWs. But also stud dogs owned by people who also own/breed mixes. Here will be NO compromises. |
|
09-03-2010, 13:25 | #40 |
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,939
|
[quote = Admin; 285.155] L'allevatore decide di cani possibile utilizzo con displasia ellbow, problemi cardiaci, epilessia o altri problemi.
[/ Quote] well, has always been what we were trying to impress you. A greeting and good work |
|
|