About "stud list" on wolfdog.org

Mikael · 26-01-2010, 18:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martab

Hallo, nice to meet everyone!

Let's actualize the list:
dany
bonfiglioli
hayla
riko06
star
sunnyna
betti
piccolino
anastasia
laila
edha
jal
molisanodream
starjumper
erica&amy
elisaP
i piccy
Antarctica
arf
woland77
aly87
matteo&martina
valentina
frafairy
na
mogwai
divina
maya
ciao69
bricicca1
arnaldo it
venerusoangelo
giobi 81
tatanka1094
luca
pisculli
marco
zach
chiara.giardini
m.greta
Lyudmila Encheva
roby e gaio
sirius
zattilio
littlewolf
fede86
denial
odisseo
sciamalaia
robykut
MariNoor
amaguk
ezibaby
gilda
ste
chepi
ciao69
riko06
mat
littlewolf
hadankama
ovogibba
wolflinx
germans
ornella
vassel
laila
martab
navarre
Mikael
Runningwolf
z Peronoòwki
michaelundinaeicchorn
mijke
Nebulosa
Rona
Americani

whereas Jmvdwiel is "against of removing the dogs without ED results", but I guess not against including dogs WITH ED results, whatever the result is. Is it correct?
Are we in 78 or 79?

-1 read Mijke´s post nr 3 and 8

It is to be 77-1 I think

Very best regards / Mikael

Martab · 26-01-2010, 19:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikael

-1 read Mijke´s post nr 2 and 8

Ii is to be 77-1 I think

Very best regards / Mikael

I understand that you wish to include only dogs with HD and ED results. And I think that this is the wish everyone has.
But in this moment we have to consider that dogs without ED results are included, whereas dogs with not positive ED results are excluded.

I believe that the FIRST STEP to be taken is to include all dogs with or without ED results, and not to discriminate dogs with "not perfect" ED results, as explained in the petition. (this is MY personal point of view, not the point of view of all the petitioners)

Only afterwards, we can think about new rules to be applied.
The point is that the actual situation is clearly unfair and discriminatory, and needs to be changed immediately.
Agreeing on the "new rules" to be applied is much more complicated, and requires reasonings to be shared...this is my thought but I am more than willing to consider different proposals

sciamalaia · 26-01-2010, 19:23

Marta please let Mijke out from the list for the moment because it's not clear what he thinks about this last proposal.

Martab · 26-01-2010, 19:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by sciamalaia

Marta please let Mijke out from the list for the moment because it's not clear what he thinks about this last proposal.

No problem, I only wanted to make clear that one thing is the petition posted by Navarre, and another thing is the discussion on how to set new rules for the stud list.
We now are in 77

Mikael · 26-01-2010, 20:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martab

I understand that you...

Sorry Martab my falt

I meant post nr 3 and 8 not nr 2 and 8

I´m Mikael not Mijke by the way

Best regards / Mikael

26-01-2010, 19:23	#3
sciamalaia Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Mestre Posts: 2,300	Marta please let Mijke out from the list for the moment because it's not clear what he thinks about this last proposal.