![]() |
![]() |
|
Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 575
|
![]() Quote:
Greetings Rolf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
![]() Quote:
But Brita cant have had 2,99 Million descendants on a breed on totaly 7500 individuals in the world today... Or am I wrong ![]() Regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Howling Member
|
![]() Quote:
All of the best, Marcy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 575
|
![]() Quote:
![]() In other words : the number is how many times the dog will show up in pedigrees all the way back to the beginning of the breed ![]() Greetings Rolf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Scandinavian Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 1,089
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Still confused, regards / Mikael
__________________
_________________________________________________ *Hronec, Rasty, Zilja * Kennel, Wolfdog of Sweden* http://kennelwolfdogofsweden.vpsite.se/Home.html
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 575
|
![]()
well I guess by now Brita will be in all living CSW`s pedigree(more than once) and the breed started back in 1955, so even that only about 7500 CSW`s are living now, a lot more is dead, which also have Brita in their pedigree(more than once).
If you try counting some of the dogs with small numbers it fits, But I guess that we must wait for Elf to answer on this ? ![]() Greetings Rolf Last edited by Juniorwolf; 20-12-2008 at 02:52. Reason: more text |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 766
|
![]() Quote:
I built full pedigree, this means that due to inbreeding the full pedigree tree can be really huge (there is 2^N entries for depth N). I checked for bug but did not find (I can post the code if one want to check). Thoughts: - Interesting point, I guess you all see the "shift" the breed took in the newer years... - Other interesting point, Rep z Pohraniční stráže (0.544571871203%) is in all pedigree of living CsV would be interesting to check dog with lower % and check for dogs doesn't appear in all pedigree (and proportions), this would give a "discriminant separating" point for nowadays "lines". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|