|
|
|
|||||||
| Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
hi i understand about the wolf blood never leaving the blood line but if defra looked at it like that we wouldnt be aloud any dogs over here, what im lookin for is a hyperthetical responce kinda. like if the bood percentage is 50/50 the next generation is 25 etc, this is how defra do it not my idea. but tecnicaly after a certain amount litters the percentage would be 0, would it not? and if that is so, tecnicaly we would be aloud them over here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Perhaps breeding is a different issue, I do not know about that, because I think my husband was more asking about the problem of actually bringing CSW into UK and having it there. Not sure if he asked about breeding, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
Quote:
Just to find out in the end that any dog's DNA differs from wolf's DNA by 1% or something like this. But in this case we don't talk of CSV breeding any more, because a CSV pup must be born from CSV parents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
I think, wolfdogs have not over 30%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 847
|
simple question - simple answer:
a csw with 32 % who is mated with a csw having 28 % do have pups 32 % + 28 % = 60 % : 2 = 30 %. If this "child" of 30 % will be mated with another csw of 34 % = 64 % : 2 = 32 %. So again you will never reach zero. cheers Angelika |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Distinguished Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kraków
Posts: 3,509
|
Quote:
1. the genetics 2. the distance from the last "fresh" wolf blood insertion, which has nothing to do with genetic calculations or percentages. I don't belive people in DEFRA are that ignorant as to think that after 100 generations of matching CSV with CSV the GSD's genes would be earased from them, so why should the wolf's be? Maybe they think that if for several generations the dogs "behaved themselves" it would mean the 'wilderness' in them was tamed, but this argument is even more absurd in the light of the possibility of breeding "dangerous" breeds and the fact that even the Yorshire terrier may be a wild beast if badly socialised and treated. I think DEFRA people don't want to legitimize the breed for totally different reasons, which I think I understand now better than before. Still, it has nothing to do with allowing CSVs to travel to or to live in the UK to which there are no barriers other than for other breeds/dogs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
|
Whole "wolfblood percentage" counting is absolutelly stupidity, because it says NOTHING. Its like you counting settlement density in country and you are supriced, that average density is 12 people/sqkm and you dont see so much people in forrest. "Wolfblood percentage" is pure aritmethic number. Have nothing to do with breed.
Rona write it correct. Every dog have some percentage of wilf animal, from which came in the past. But nobody can conting it, because is not the dates. Maybe some boxers or shitzu have more "wildblood percentage", than CsW, but nobody can counting it. And clearly mathematic - all dogs have 100% "wildblood", because dogs came not through crossing wild animals with some space creatures, but all dogs came from domestication wild animals only. This is differency between "domestication" and "wilfblood counting", whats many people dont want understand. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|