![]() |
![]() |
|
Breeding Information about breeding, selection, litters.... |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Maybe not all readers know that Kazan has not only produced dogs with many defects but dogs with his blood are also some of the best looking dogs around. YOU say that it's Kazan's fault for the negative influence and dogs with him in pedigree could even be better without him. This you cannot prove... and it's a very clever "word game" If it's bad, it's his fault, if it's good it's surely not thanks to him. I believe, instead, that Kazan's presence helped avoid the CHATASTROFIC imbreeding on REP which was all around. I am not so sure that the breed would have been better and healthier without Kazan...actually I'm convinced of the opposite. I do not agree, on the other hand, that the breed is so bad today that we need fresh wolfblood. Expecially if it's not even the same wolf from which the breed was born. BUT... I repeat, many people didn't agree with the "Kazan" idea either. Moreover, to my eyes Czech dogs look, in general, less wolfish indeed... but much healthier than Slovak ones. One of my favourite females. http://www.wolfdog.org/ita/dbase/p494-6.html I even like her daughter a lot http://www.wolfdog.org/ita/dbase/d6653.html And her brother is very famous in italy for having one of the best "bodies" ever: (the pic on WD is awful though) http://www.wolfdog.org/ita/dbase/p490-6.html They have lots of Kazan in them.
__________________
---------- Oliver & Lunatica |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|